ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ARCHIVIST,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ARCHIVIST,
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
Arch Dis Child 1999;80:376 ( April )

Archivist

Xylitol and acute otitis media

Xylitol is used as an artificial sweetener and its use prevents dental caries, not only by replacing sucrose but also by inhibiting Streptococcus mutans. Paediatricians in Finland found that xylitol also inhibited the growth of pneumococci, and in a 1996 BMJ paper they showed that xylitol chewing gum reduced the occurrence of otitis media in children old enough to chew it. Now they have compared xylitol syrup, lozenges, and gum with placebos in younger children (Matti Uhari and colleagues. Pediatrics 1998;102:879-84).

  The study included 857 healthy children aged from 7 months to 7 years attending day care centres. Those old enough to chew safely were randomly assigned to xylitol or placebo, chewing gum or lozenges. The younger ones were randomised to xylitol or placebo syrup. Over a trial period of three months the incidence of acute otitis media was reduced by 30% with xylitol syrup, by 40% with chewing gum, and by 20% with lozenges, compared with the placebo groups. There were similar reductions in the use of antibiotics.

  Commentators (Ibid: 971-2 and 974-5) caution against rushing into the widespread administration of xylitol to children. Their reasons are both theoretical (the dose needed for young children could cause gastrointestinal upset, its safety is not established, and the long term effectiveness is uncertain) and pragmatic (the minimal effective dose is not known (it was given five times daily in the trial) and there are no suitable preparations available in the USA). The way in which xylitol produces this effect is far from clear. An antipneumococcal action does not seem to be a full explanation.

  It seems unlikely that xylitol treatment of all children will be either practicable or desirable but further work could show it to be beneficial for those with recurrent acute otitis media. The associated decrease in antibiotic use is attractive in view of present concerns about antibiotic resistance.

ARCHIVIST


© 1999 by Archives of Disease in Childhood

Relevant Article

Rapid responses
Arch. Dis. Child. 2001 84: 310. [Extract] [Full Text]



eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Xylitol is available in America
W McLean
ADC Online, 10 Jan 2001 [Full text]

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ARCHIVIST,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ARCHIVIST,
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health